What the index measures
The salary and wage rates component of the Labour Cost Index (LCI) measures movements in base salary and ordinary time wage rates and overtime wage rates. The non-wage component measures changes in the following costs:
- annual leave and statutory holidays
- superannuation
- ACC employer premiums
- medical insurance
- motor vehicles available for private use
- low interest loans.
The LCI sits alongside the Producers Price Inputs Index (which measures changes in businesses’ current costs of production, excluding labour and capital costs, as defined by the New Zealand System of National Accounts' concept of intermediate consumption) and the Capital Goods Price Index (which measures changes in businesses’ capital costs). This is shown in Figure 1 below. These three indexes provide measures of the extent to which changes in businesses’ input costs put pressure on the output prices they charge for goods and services. Information from the Annual Enterprise Survey indicates that labour costs account for about 16 percent of employers’ total expenditure (including depreciation).
Figure 1
The LCI has fixed industry and occupation weights, and measures changes in salary and wage rates for a fixed quantity and quality of labour input. Service increments, merit promotions and increases (and decreases) relating to the performance of employees are not shown in the index (see the section on quality control for more details). By comparison, the average earnings measures from the Quarterly Employment Survey (QES) reflect not only changes in pay rates, but also compositional change (ie changes in the mix of labour from period to period).
Index calculation and base
The index is calculated using the price-relatives form of the base-weighted Laspeyres formula, and is expressed on a base of the June 2001 quarter 1000). The index’s calculation base is periodically updated to reflect changes in the sector of ownership of organisations.
Coverage
The index covers jobs filled by paid employees in all occupations and in all industries except private households employing staff. Coverage was extended to include jobs filled by paid employees under 15 years of age when the index was reweighted and re-expressed on a base of the June 2001 quarter (1000).
Weights
Each job description used in calculating the index was assigned a weight that reflected the relative importance of the job description within its sector of ownership, industry and occupation group. Weights were calculated using 2006 Census of Population and Dwellings information on the relative importance of occupations within each sector by industry group, Business Frame (BF) information on the relative importance of industry groups within each sector, and pay rates surveyed in the June 2008 quarter.
Occupation-group weights for all salary and wage rates are given in the following table.
| Occupation group |
Weight (Percent) |
| Legislators, administrators and managers |
20.1 |
| Professionals |
20.9 |
| Technicians and associate professionals |
12.8 |
| Managers, professionals and technicians |
53.8 |
| Clerks |
10.5 |
| Service and sales workers |
9.7 |
| Clerks, service and sales workers |
20.2 |
| Agriculture and fishery workers |
4.0 |
| Trades workers |
8.3 |
| Plant and machine operators and assemblers |
8.6 |
| Elementary occupations |
5.1 |
| Other occupations |
26.0 |
| All occupations combined |
100.0 |
Note: Percentages may not sum to totals due to rounding.
How information is obtained
Salary and ordinary time and overtime wage rates for a fixed set of job descriptions are obtained by a quarterly postal survey of employers. Each quarter, salary and wage rates are surveyed for the pay period in which the 15th of the middle month of the quarter falls.
Quality control
The index is a quality-controlled measure. Only changes in salary and wage rates for the same quality and quantity of work are reflected in the index. This is achieved in practice by asking respondents to provide reasons for movements in salary and wage rates. If a movement is due to more than one reason, the respondent is also asked to indicate how much of the movement is due to each reason. To further assist the measurement of movements in pay rates for a fixed level of labour input, job descriptions are specified in detail. Surveyed job descriptions typically specify the duties involved, qualifications required, years of service and number of hours worked.
In theory, these job descriptions should remain fixed between index revisions. In practice, many descriptions change over time, usually as a result of changes to contractual arrangements or because specific employees are being tracked through time. If a newly negotiated contract involves an increase in the number of ordinary time hours worked per week, then the description is amended and an adjustment is made to ensure that the pay rate movement used in the index relates to the same quantity of work as specified in the new contract.
Similarly, rates being paid for job descriptions in the survey may change partly or wholly because employees undertaking these jobs have become more experienced, more (or less) proficient or productive, better qualified,have taken on additional responsibilities or have been promoted. Components of salary and wage rate movements that are due to changes of this type in the quality of work are not reflected in index movements. The policy of excluding increases due to service increments and merit promotions is consistent with this approach.
One-off payments in lieu of pay rises are also excluded, as they do not result in changes to pay rates, as such. There have been several employment contract settlements in recent years of this type, particularly in the central government sector.
Regular fixed allowances and regular fixed bonuses are included in surveyed pay rates. Where included, these are specified in job descriptions. Payments such as commissions and irregular bonuses are excluded, however, as these payments are usually performance related.
In instances where allowances, penal rates and other payments (eg commissions), which have not previously been included in surveyed rates, are incorporated into base rates, only the overall effect of such changes is reflected in the index.
Index number rounding
Index number rounding uses standard Statistics New Zealand rounding procedures. It can occasionally result in movements for a particular cost being slightly higher or lower than would be expected, given movements recorded for component costs.
For example, the all sectors combined increase for salary and ordinary wage rates of 0.6 percent from the December 2002 quarter to the March 2003 quarter is larger than the 0.5 percent increases for both the public sector and the private sector. The higher figure for all sectors combined was mainly caused by both the index number for the December 2002 quarter and the public sector index number for the March 2003 quarter being rounded down to the nearest index point.
Median and mean increases
The latest quarterly and annual results for the median and mean increases are discussed in the commentary. The mean tends to be higher than the median because the distribution changes in pay rates are skewed to the right, with a bulge at the low end and a tail at the high end. The relatively few large increases boost the mean increase but have little effect on the median increase.
The median and mean increases are calculated using the percentage change in recorded salary and ordinary time wage rates. This differs from the quarterly and annual index movements, which measure the percentage change between calculated index numbers.
Analytical unadjusted series
An analytical unadjusted index series, based on ordinary time pay rates collected in the LCI sample, is available in the tables of this release. These tables are available on the Statistics NZ website (http://www.stats.govt.nz/).
The analytical unadjusted series is an additional measure that is intended to complement the official LCI and QES indicators and provide users with a fuller picture on the wages front. The analytical unadjusted series is not affected by relative employment shifts between industries and between occupations, but, in addition to price change, it does reflect quality change within occupations.
In simple terms, the approaches taken in compiling the published and analytical unadjusted series could be summarised as follows:
Published index:
- often tracks employees, but does not show performance-related increases or service increments
- commonly links in new employees (without showing change)
Analytical unadjusted index:
- often tracks employees, and shows performance-related increases and service increments
- shows any change when new employees replace incumbents.
The LCI is a price index that measures change in pay rates for a fixed quality and quantity of labour input. Price-related change in rates reported by respondents, such as those to reflect the cost of living, to match market rates, to retain staff and to attract staff, are shown in the index. Changes in reported rates that are the result of service increments, merit promotions, increases (and decreases) relating to the performance of individual employees, and change in hours worked are not shown in the index, as they are considered to represent quality or quantity change.
The analytical unadjusted index retains fixed weights for occupations within industries within sectors of ownership, but is based on a matched sample of reported rates for the previous and current quarters prior to quality control. In addition to price change, it reflects quality change within occupations, such as change in the performance of individual employees, change in the qualifications, responsibility or experience of employees filling surveyed positions, and the effect of different employees replacing incumbent employees in surveyed positions at lower or higher rates.
Rates for which the pay periods reported by respondents (eg per annum, per week, per hour) differ from those for the previous period, and rates where change is wholly or partly due to change in hours worked, are excluded from the matched sample. Typically, between 1 and 2 percent of surveyed rates are excluded from the unadjusted index each quarter for these reasons.
The analytical unadjusted index is calculated using a matched sample of reported rates for the previous and current quarters. Expenditure weights are used to weight movements in reported rates from the previous quarter to the current quarter. To derive the expenditure weights, the price changes (after quality control) of job positions in the sample (from the base period to the previous quarter) are used to scale base-period expenditure weights (which are then assigned to job positions in the sample).
It should be noted that the LCI is designed to measure change in pay rates for a fixed quality and quantity of labour input. The sample of surveyed pay rates is not particularly suitable for preparing a measure that includes quality change. This is due in part to the fact that some positions in the survey follow individual employees (with corresponding pay rates subject to both quality and price change) and some positions specify particular points on pay scales (which are usually subject only to price change). In general, individual employees are tracked for positions surveyed in the private sector, and for positions surveyed in the public sector there is a mix of points on pay scales and individual employees being tracked.
The analytical unadjusted index reflects quality change within occupations. How well this is measured partly depends on how well the sample represents entrances and exits of employees, and on whether the sample replacement practice is unbiased in this regard (eg in some cases, replacement employees are incumbent employees filling other positions rather than new employees filling the existing positions – this can happen when there is a delay filling vacancies in surveyed positions). In addition, the analytical unadjusted index tends to reflect the effect of turnover in, and the cessation of, existing positions, but not the price and/or quality effect associated with employees being hired to fill new positions. An unadjusted measure designed from scratch might make use of the average pay rate within each surveyed firm of all employees filling jobs in each surveyed occupation.
The published LCI is a fixed-weight price index that measures changes in pay rates for a fixed quality and quantity of labour input. The index is not affected by relative shifts in the occupational and industrial composition of the pool of paid employees. It is useful in the context of the extent to which changes in businesses' input labour costs might put pressure on the output prices they charge for goods and services.
The analytical unadjusted LCI series has fixed weights for occupations within industries within sectors of ownership, so is not affected by relative employment shifts between industries and occupations. However, it does reflect quality shifts within occupations. The index uses weights based on the mix of employment in occupations and industries evident in 2001, so will not take account of the effect of any long-term structural shifts that have occurred since then, on the relative importance of occupations within industries within sectors of ownership. In addition, it will not reflect:
- the effect of very new or emerging occupations and industries
- the effect of employers mitigating the effect of skill shortages by substituting away from occupations showing high relative price change to occupations showing lower relative price change (eg from carpenter to builder's labourer, or from registered nurse to nurse aide).
In addition to changes in pay rates, change in the QES measures of total and average gross earnings fully reflect compositional change, such as change from period to period in the proportions of employees and paid hours in different industries and different occupations. The measures reflect relative employment shifts both between and within industries and occupations. These measures are useful in the context of the potential effect that change in
gross and average income earned by paid employees might have on the demand for goods and services purchased by the household sector.
An example of how a specific position would be treated in the published LCI and in the analytical unadjusted index follows:
Year |
Salary scale |
Step 1 |
Step 2 |
Step 3 |
Step 4 |
Step 5 |
1 |
$30,000 |
$40,000 |
$50,000 |
$60,000 |
$70,000 |
2 |
$30,900 |
$41,200 |
$51,500 |
$61,800 |
$72,100 |
3 |
$31,827 |
$42,436 |
$53,045 |
$63,654 |
$74,263 |
4 |
$32,782 |
$43,709 |
$54,636 |
$65,564 |
$76,491 |
5 |
$33,765 |
$45,020 |
$56,275 |
$67,531 |
$78,786 |
Year/ quarter |
Reported pay rate (per annum) |
Reason for change |
Treatment |
Published LCI |
Analytical unadjusted index |
| Y1Q1 |
$40,000 |
|
|
1000 |
1000 |
| Y1Q2 |
$40,000 |
|
|
1000 |
1000 |
| Y1Q3 |
$40,000 |
|
|
1000 |
1000 |
| Y1Q4 |
$40,000 |
|
|
1000 |
1000 |
| Y2Q1 |
$41,200 |
Price adjustment to step 2 of scale to match market rates and reflect the cost of living. |
Price change; shown in the published and unadjusted indexes. |
1030 |
1030 |
Year/ quarter |
Reported pay rate (per annum) |
Reason for change |
Treatment |
Published LCI |
Analytical unadjusted index |
| Y2Q2 |
$51,500 |
Service increment from step 2 to step 3. |
Quality change; shown only in the unadjusted index. |
1030 |
1288 |
| Y2Q3 |
$51,500 |
|
|
1030 |
1288 |
| Y2Q4 |
$51,500 |
|
|
1030 |
1288 |
| Y3Q1 |
$53,045 |
Price adjustment to step 3 of scale to match market rates and reflect the cost of living. |
Price change; shown in the published and unadjusted indexes. |
1061 |
1326 |
| Y3Q2 |
$42,436 |
New, less experienced employee placed on step 2 replaces the incumbent. |
Quality change; shown only in the unadjusted index. |
1061 |
1061 |
| Y3Q3 |
$42,436 |
|
|
1061 |
1061 |
| Y3Q4 |
$42,436 |
|
|
1061 |
1061 |
| Y4Q1 |
$43,709 |
Price adjustment to step 2 of scale to match market rates and reflect the cost of living. |
Price change; shown in the published and unadjusted indexes. |
1093 |
1093 |
| Y4Q2 |
$54,636 |
Service increment from step 2 to step 3. |
Quality change; shown only in the unadjusted index. |
1093 |
1366 |
| Y4Q3 |
$54,636 |
|
|
1093 |
1366 |
| Y4Q4 |
$54,636 |
|
|
1093 |
1366 |
| Y5Q1 |
$56,275 |
Price adjustment to step 3 of scale to match market rates and reflect the cost of living. |
Price change; shown in the published and unadjusted indexes. |
1126 |
1407 |
| Y5Q2 |
$45,020 |
New, less experienced employee placed on step 2 replaces the incumbent. |
Quality change; shown only in the unadjusted index. |
1126 |
1126 |
| Y5Q3 |
$45,020 |
|
|
1126 |
1126 |
| Y5Q4 |
$45,020 |
|
|
1126 |
1126 |
More information
For more information, follow the link from the technical notes of this release on the Statistics New Zealand website.
Copyright
Information obtained from Statistics NZ may be freely used, reproduced, or quoted unless otherwise specified. In all cases Statistics NZ must be acknowledged as the source.
Liability
While care has been used in processing, analysing and extracting information, Statistics NZ gives no warranty that the information supplied is free from error. Statistics NZ shall not be liable for any loss suffered through the use, directly or indirectly, of any information, product or service.
Timing
Timed statistical releases are delivered using postal and electronic services provided by third parties. Delivery of these releases may be delayed by circumstances outside the control of Statistics NZ. Statistics NZ accepts no responsibility for any such delays.